SCOTUS is on a roll.
In addition to continuing to treat poor students as piggy banks, they also decided that web creatives can deny services to LGBTQIA customers.
This case should never even have been granted cert: it’s a fake case with imaginary facts—the plaintiff never even had a queer customer.
Does this mean a web host might soon make the same argument for why it can’t host a queer website? I’m sure we’ll find out.
The sheer willful blindness of this latest SCOTUS ruling … 🤥
Ignoring race in college admissions helps no one, and only serves to further entrench the status quo. (Spoiler: the status quo is _not_ racial equality).
https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-rules-against-affirmative-action-c94b5a9c
The ambiguity of the term “gender-affirming care” has already been leveraged for panic (with kids, gender-affirming care is a therapist), but Fox won’t accept even beneficial ambiguity when straight out lies will work panic better. 😩
Pocket surfaced this brief interview with Emily Short for me this morning. https://www.nme.com/features/gaming-features/boss-level-2023-emily-short-3455197?utm_source=pocket_home
I’m such a mega-huge nerd fan of hers. 🥰 Her procedurally generated guidebook, Annals of the Parrigues, was a huge inspiration to a chat-as-game project I was working on five years ago (and would still like to get back to). It’s so much fun to see the her here, fashion-photography style.
"Emily Short is an incredible badass and here are some glamour shots of her in a fierce Baba Yaga suit" should be an article in every rock magazine tbh, she's worked so hard & I'm so fuckin proud of her
https://www.nme.com/features/gaming-features/boss-level-2023-emily-short-3455197
I was pretty disappointed when @bass_rock told me that adding new and different types of timelines looks to be a pain. That seems like an obvious point for extensibility.
I think there’s a lot that be done to address the user-facing impact of these issues at the client level through thoughtful UX (especially multi-modal interfaces). Onboarding and discovery, in particular, are so bad out of the box that almost any improvements will be meaningful improvements.
The closest one can get to the benefits of a true nomadic mastodon identity is to spin up a single-user instance. I think this is funny.
Of course, these are all social graph problems at heart. Path—my all time favorite social network—was all ablut tiny communities of besties and/or families; LinkedIn is self-selecting professional relationships (effectively instance-based); Facebook and Instagram are basically just the whole of humanity, a few of which you’ve favorited; Google Plus (as well as I remember it), was very forward about allowing you to create different “circles,” but we all balked at the overhead of it all.
So, obviously, just don’t do large instances at all, right? But then we’re back to the discoverability, administrative, and operational problems. (All of which can be pitched as features, if you look at them from the right angle).
But instances are administrative and technical obstacles, and discoverability is not good. There’s a potentially a lot of duplication of effort across instances, some of which reflects community values, some of which are probably shared by all users. (e.g., community content moderation versus global security)
Right now, instances are the closest corollary to communities. Ideally, your instance is populated by people who are similar enough to you in enough ways that your conversations are rewarding, and your federated timeline more relevant than not.
🏳️⚧️ Proudly Trans
🌉 Bay Area
Product-Engineering Manager for a software product portfolio; former iOS dev; attorney (CA/IL); large-format photographer; marriage ministress; cinema nut; weeb; lifelong weird girl.
Lover of myths, legends, fairy tales, fantasies, and folklore; 6502 assembly aspirer; book hoarder; gaming nostalgist; gore-adverse, torture-adverse feminist horror film fan; food worshipper; Slack poet; ace-demi-recipro-crier; a total and complete mess.
🍶::🍷::🍺::🍹::🍸